(English Version)

( También hay disponible una versión en Español )

 

 

 

DOCTORS CONTRERAS’

A2C

FABULOUS

REGIMEN

 

 

 

By Omar Contreras

Universidad de Carabobo, Physics Teacher

February 2003

 

Translated with the kindly help of Nichole Contreras


 

 

 

Dedicated to:

Jetsun Gampopa Rinpoche, the nonpareil sage and physician of Tibet,

and to

Dr. José Gregorio Hernandéz praying for his beatification.

Also dedicated to my family.

 

INTRODUCTION

This publication embraces the original theory developed by my grandfather. Dr. J. G. Contreras P., who graduated from the Central University of Venezuela as a chemical-pharmacist. His theory was later applied and improved by my father. Dr. J. G. Contreras M., who also graduated from the Central University of Venezuela; he as a physician. My father, in turn, taught this theory to me, and to my brother, J. G. Contreras V, who graduated from the Central University of Venezuela, as a chemist and who has made contributions to the theory as well.

All that is exposed in this publication is material originated in Venezuela and cannot be found in any other book or publication except for that of my grandfather written in 1938.

Finally, I should state that none of the ideas expressed in this work are mine. I have only written my grandfather's original ideas and the later developments of his theories made by my father. The contribution that I make to the theory in this publication is to express their ideas in a simple way so that they can be understood by the general population.


IDENTIFICATION OF THE PROBLEM

When considering the interaction of the human body with the environment that surrounds it, we can identify the following four possible causes, or origins, of external illnesses (Figure 1):

 


Figure 1.   Possible causes of external illnesses.

In this study we will pay attention to the most controversial of the possible causes, since it is common to consider norish a factor of health, and not a factor of illness.  We will, however, present the cases in which special care should be taken with nutrition in order to prevent illness.

Figure 2 schematically illustrates the process of ingestion of food by the human body:

 


Figure 2    Feeding Process

Modifications to the food are made in the digestive tract by saliva, gastric acids, bile, pancreatic juices, and the bowels.  However, when this modified food goes to the sanguine torrent by passing through the intestinal walls, it is taken by different biochemical mills within the body toward its end metabolism into the cells.  Finally, after some eight hours or more of having ingested the food, the waste products are eliminated by the digestive system.  Hundred to thousands biochemical reactions are carried out inside the cells in so extraordinarily complex instances, that many intermediate by-products between one reaction and the next are produced.

These intermediate by-products, in turn, are again processed, as many times as necessary, until they transform to final products that will become part of the human body.  The sequence of the formation for these end products is predetermined by the DNA, with the help of enzymes, hormones, RNA, etc.

There exist some cases where end products are not adequate to form part of the human body, in this cases the normal way to discard these non-useful products is through urine, however, due to the enormous complexity of body reactions, it is also possible that several of them cannot be successfully disposed, and, therefore, these non-useful by-products are processed by cells in other mechanisms that, as Figure 3 indicates, we have called processes in the A2C zone, for reasons that will become apparent later:

 

 


Figure 3. Food Processing Schematics.

 

In resume, here we see that we can have one or more intermediate products that were introduced to the organism through ingestion, but for highly biochemical reasons ( genetic, somatic, and/or psycho-somatic ) they cannot be fully metabolized and, therefore, the organism must get rid of them.  We have found that the human body has some predetermined ways of disposing of them. Which way to biochemically choose one depends on the patient's history, his/her health current state, external conditions, DNA, etc.  We have simplified and schematized these predetermined processes by thinking on “biochemical exit roads”.  Those exit mechanisms are "triggered" by internal metabolic processes or by interactions with the external environment.  When a not fully metabolized substance is eliminated via the bronchus - a possible exit road - it produces asthma. When the skin or mucosas are used as an exit road, allergies occur.  And if the speed the human body is biochemically able to eliminate this non-useful substance is less than the frequency of its ingestion, the body has no other choice than to enable an organ to store the by-product, thus, producing cancer. These ideas are presented in the following picture:

 


Figure 4. Not fully metabolized Foods Elimination.

CAUSES OF THE PROBLEM

In more than eighty years that we have worked with these illnesses we have found undoubtedly that the only cause of all allergies, asthma, and cancer is simply nutrition disorders.  Additionally, our experience teaches us that there are not "good foods" or "bad foods" being the main reason that each individual is totally different from others.  And, therefore, a food may be good for certain persons and this very food could be causing cancer in others.  In this way, the concept of a well balanced diet should be specific for each individual.  This is the flaw of those diets hat claim to be good for everybody. On the other hand, we have found that in the cases of asthma and allergies the elapsed time from food ingestion until the first symptom of the illness is not immediate, but typically ranges from twenty four to thirty six hours. This fact is the main reason that the illness is not associated with a previously consumed food, but rather is immediately associated with any other factor which occurred around the same time as the symptom.  That factor is probably the one that triggered the exit, but not the one responsible for the illness.  Also, even if the food-cause is ingested only one time and not ever again, the process of its elimination can last several days usually occurring in twenty-four hour recurrents crisis intervals.  For this reason it is very important to distinguish between the food-cause and the external factor which triggers the exit mechanism.  Almost always some type of external irritation is needed to begin the process of elimination of the food-cause. Also in Cancer, some internal biochemical processes are needed to choose the suitable internal organ to store the non-processed by product of the food-cause.

 

CEASING OF THE PROBLEM

In view of the previously disclosed information, we conclude that by eliminating the ingestion of the food-cause, the organism will eliminate the non-useful substance it has inside until the illness is completely and naturally cured. Not medicines at all – including Cancer - for non-critical patients.

 

METHOD TO AVOID THE PROBLEM

The preventative method to avoid these illnesses is for one to maintain strict control of all of the foods that he/she ingests.  This method is particularly effective and easy to apply in newborns.  With each new food that is given to him or her one can watch closely for up to three days to detect if asthma or an allergic reaction takes place.  During this three-day interval one should abstain from testing other new foods to avoid that in the event of illness he/she couldn't know to which food it corresponds. In the case of adult patients who would like to determine which is the food-cause, it is necessary to use a reduced-items initial diet for a certain period of time until the symptoms of the illness completely disappears.  This lapse can vary anywhere form a few days to a few weeks for asthma and allergies, or even months in the case of cancer.  After the disappearance of the illness the previous preventative method may be used to test every new food and to determine if it has pathological effects or not.

Our initial diet is the same for almost all patients and it is based on foods that, in our experience, have been found to cause very few, if any, adverse reaction in patients.  Nevertheless, the possibility always exists that in a particular patient some of these initial diet foods may cause a negative reaction.  For example, in more than eighty years of testing this theory we have not found any patients that have generated an A2C illness as a result of the consumption of water, white rice, chicken, or apples.  However, it is not necessary to restrict the initial diet to these four items alone unless the patient is diagnosed with terminal Cancer.  And, even in this case, only while the damages of the illness are still reversible.

 

COMMENTS AND CONCLUSIONS

The ideas presented in this work contain the direct experience of more than eighty years of work on the topic.  These ideas are totally original and based on the experience and clinical observation of thousands of patients. There is still much to investigate, principally in the biochemical and genetic branches, but the road points toward research of the processes related with metabolism and nutrition. A remarkable result of my grandfather's scientific investigations was that by means of methods designed by him, he obtained a compound that helps in the metabolic process, and, as a result of it, patients are cured much quicker than with the diet alone.  Although it is certain that many medicines exist which help to cure asthma and allergies, our method of treatment is not only useful for both of these illnesses, but also applicable to Cancer patients.  Additionally, the chemical formula of the compound is quite simple, being derived from a simple organic acid.  My grandfather patented the medicine with the name Oxidamina.  The simplicity of their formula and its effectiveness in the metabolic process is a solid foundation for further biochemical investigation.  Therefore, the formula is at the disposition of any public or private laboratory or research institution that requests it.

This theory does not discard the use of medicines and drugs to combat the most severe cases of A2C illnesses, but we know that without dietary control the medicines alone are only able to palliate the affects of the illnesses. They do not eliminate the original cause.  For example, in many cases, if cancer is surgically removed without eliminating the food-cause, the organism simply chooses another organ to deposit the not metabolized still-ingested food-cause and the cancer appears again.  We have found cases in which cancer appears after asthma has been cured through drug treatments alone.

We have also seen a patient that was diagnosed with asthma after having cancer surgically removed, indicating that the food-cause was still consumed and its organism looked for another exit road.  A later dietary control cured him definitively.

Although many studies reveal that tobacco is a health perturbation element, and we do not discard the possibility that in some specific person it can cause an A2C illness, we should expose the following facts:  Statistically we know that if in a sample of only smokers we investigate the incidence of lung-cancer, we obtain a larger average than in the case that the study sample is comprised of non-smokers.  But, if in this same sample of only smokers we investigate the incidence of cancer, not only in lungs, but in any place of the body, we obtain absolutely the same average than that of the non-smoker sample in any place too.  The only logical conclusion that can be deduced from these two statistical facts is that smokers have more probability of cancer being located in the lungs than in any other organ.  The cause of cancer, however, is not the tobacco.  It is, we now know, nutrition. Cigarettes only tend to locate the cancer in the lungs, they do not produce it.

Similar investigations have been made in other human groups.  For example, those with a rich fiber diet have less chance of cancer being located in the colon, but a larger chance in the rest of the organs.

We see in this study that cancer is not by itself an illness, but rather is the remedy that uses the organism to defend against the foods that it cannot metabolize successfully.  The trouble in utilizing an organ to assume the food-cause storage is that this reduces the otherwise organ normal functions.  The outcome is often times fatal.

Psychosomatic factors affect the metabolic processes in such a way that foods, which in normal situations are well tolerated, become poorly metabolized under specific psychological conditions, and, in this way an A2C illness appears.

In general, each food-cause has its own, or predetermined, way of exiting. However, if in a patient a previous way of exit already exists, which was created by another food-cause or by an external cause (i.e. an irritation), it is common that the new food-cause will utilize this one rather than its own predetermined exit.  For example, a condiment that usually produces athlete's foot in a patient may come out through the lungs as bronchitis or asthma if the patient had a cough prior to the condiments exit.

We have found that the time it takes a food-cause from ingestion until its pathological A2 exit varies from twenty to forty hours, depending on the patient, the predetermined exit road, metabolism, the physical and psychological environment, etc.  In Cancer cases the growth speed of the tumor depends on the frequency of the ingestion of the food-cause and on the elimination speed to the exits.  It has also been noted that the elimination time of the food-cause is improved when the patient practices any kind of physical exercise.

We have found that even when the industrialization and consequent contamination negatively affect the metabolism, in most of the A2C illnesses the food-cause is just a natural food (milk, spices, fruits, carrots, potatoes, fish, vanilla, red meats, etc).

We recommend that patients avoid foods with chemical preservatives in all of the initial diets.  Additionally, we suspend the consumption of spices and condiments in these diets as well. Although many people can tolerate them their entire life without any problem, we have found a great incidence of A2C illnesses due to them.

Almost all of the so-called "flues" that do not present signs of a viral infection such as a fever are simply rhinitis or allergic bronchitis caused by foods.

No qualification exists to determine if a food is good or bad. Likewise, there is no division between cancerigenic and non-cancergenic foods.  That is, no one good diet exists for all people.  Each individual is different, and, therefore, particular foods can be very good for some people and cause A2C illnesses in others.  For example, some patients cannot metabolize garlic – which is good for many persons and mostly recommended by many dietitians -, while others cannot metabolize various types of fruit.

An initial regimen of white rice, chicken, and some vegetables with no restriction as to their quantities provides the body with enough proteins, fats, and carbohydrates, and, therefore does not put the patient at risk of malnutrition.  Later on the food types and amounts may be increased, monitoring their effects, until the patient arrives at a fully diversified diet with his/her food-cause elimination.

The food-cause is usually among those foods that he/she likes to eat, since those that he/she does not eat cannot be responsible for any illness.

We have known cases of patients that have been cured of Cancer with a diet like the macrobiotics diet or others that have followed a diet of only fruits, and they claim that these diets are good in all the cases.  Our experience indicates, however, that this is by no means so. There is no an unique diet useful to all. We believe than in this cases there were a coincidence in eliminate the food-cause, but the same macrobiotic-type diet is not suitable for everybody.

Some patients have also been cured by moving to other places from sea lands toward the mountains or vice versa, and in these cases we suspect that the main factor was actually a change in their nutrition habits that cured them.

We have had cases of cured Cancer in patients that, after abandoning the diet, have developed Cancer once again, and upon returning to the initial strict regimen, the Cancer disappears again.  This feature of our diet has never been defeated by any other cancer treatment and is one of the most solid experimental bases of the theory.

We have found that several yet unknown illness’ causes, such as dermatitis, acne, athlete's foot, sinusitis, varices, hemorrhoids, arthritis, hair loss, and muscle tics are all A2C illnesses.  For example, in all the cases in which we treated hair loss, the patients stopped losing hair after a month of a strict diet eliminating milk and all dairy products. Three months later they began to recover the lost hair.

The only practical way to follow the dietary regimen with total control and accuracy is to eat only homemade foods, since it is not possible to have complete control at restaurants, etc.

As the human body's food processing factory deteriorates with age sometime foods that we have tolerated well during life, become difficult to metabolize when aging.  So it is very important to maintain strict dietary control when getting older.

We really are what we eat.  The cow eats grass but transforms it into cow; therefore, we should look for the origin of many problems in our food intake.

The results of our diets are fabulous! One hundred percent of the patients that have followed the dietary regimen have been cured.

It is extraordinarily difficult to follow a diet.  The patients that achieve it have great merit and their recompenses are health and life.

Our treated cases are totally documented by their medical histories, and in many cases corroborated by independent laboratories and clinics.

We can clearly distinguish three principal constituents in our theory, as is represented in the next picture:

 

 


Figure 5. Components of A2C illness.

I.                  Patients are biochemical processing food factories with innate, developed or aged degenerated malfunctions.

II.              External Food-cause or Foods-cause to which patients are not capable of metabolize successfully.

III.           The internal biochemical or external irritation Trigger to initiate the output of non-metabolized food, or the biochemical Location process to assign an internal organ to store the not so fast disposed food. Those processes externally constitute what is called symptomatology of the illness.

Medical science has focused its efforts mainly in the third of them. They had looking for Asthma and Allergies’ causes in dust, cats, humidity, feathers, etc. They had looked for Cancer’s cause in cigarettes, UV radiation, chemical compounds, etc. They are mistaken the trigger/location mechanism with the real cause of this diseases.

I had met few persons who cured from these diseases by drinking natural depuratives. In these cases they fixed the first element, i.e. the food processing factory, to allow success metabolizing of the unknown food-cause. Drawbacks for this method are that, due to individual differences, is not possible to use one depurative for all patients, and looking for the right depurative is harder and risky than looking for the food-cause. Furthermore, it is known that biochemical processing factory will degrade with age and the same depurative may not work well again.

We are very convinced that the fastest and effective method to refrain these diseases is to seek the food-cause and eliminating it from the patient’s diet.

In future a genetic test will determine which foods are not allowed to a person and the way to surmount metabolic dysfunctions. But all we know now for sure is that the way to cure these diseases is only through nourish understanding.

In short, nourish is the one and only cause of Asthma, Allergies and Cancer, since, as shown at Figure 1, it is the only other thing that get it’s way into our body.

Further information is available at the addresses and e-mail addresses at the end of this book.

 

May the world health be benefited by the publication of this book,

Amen.

 

BIBLIOGRAPHY AND REFERENCES

The only bibliographical reference is my grandfather’s book “Cellular Combustion”, by Dr. José G. Contreras P. Coperative editorial of Graphics Arts, Caracas, 1938.

Additionally my father José G. Contreras MD is actually writing a more technical book on these topics. He is presenting this theory in a more formal way with the scientific support and medical stories in full. Besides, he maintains a web page with information about this theme. At present he has moved to USA, but he can be Internet contacted in the following address:

             Web Page:          http://geocities.com/oxidamina/

             e-mail:                oxidamina@yahoo.com

Additionally you can get a copy of the book “Combustión Celular” by requesting it to my brother’s e-mail:               incoquim@cantv.net

 

Comments: ocontrer@uc.edu.ve.